Wednesday, 19 November 2014

Earth Hoax? - Part 1 of 2. Don't Spin Out!


After 40 hours or so intense research and contemplation I seek to condense and simplify some of what I've found thus far.   Obviously I've spent much of this time looking at different angles and trying to actually 'debunk' what first appears as an incredulous theory or belief.   I'm really looking for someone to debunk this - so if you laugh (as I did, and still do) - prove it wrong, and pull me out of this rabbit hole of fun and laughter :-)

If you are not able to look at information openly, or if you are not going to look at the information in order, or if you are not aware of NASA's links to Project Paperclip, Freemasonry, and lies, then this article is not for you.....too much of a leap.

***

For millenia man thought the world was flat, and then around 300BC some Greek dudes got into the first debates about Geocentric (spherical Stationary Earth in the middle of the Solar System)   versus the Heliocentric model (spherical Sun in the middle and earth spinning around it).

Ptolem and Aristotle around 200AD went on to develop and push the Geocentric model into the minds of the people.....it made sense.



Then over a 1500 years later, in the 16th and 17th Centuries, Copernicus, Kepler, Galileo, and Newton, added to the Heliocentric model, one that we all pretty much use to this day.  It explained retrograde motions better, and went away from the words in the Bible, causing a revolution of thought.  It should be noted here that Heliocentric and Geocentric models were and are both theories, and also to be noted is that Newton was a magician, occultist, and alchemist, more than he was a scientist.



Good, calm, nice and easy....breath......because things are going to get pretty crazy real soon.....a light hors d'oeuvres for anyone getting bored?   Why the hell not.


Moving on, in the mid 19th Century a French dude spun some pendulums about in  a Church in Paris, in some strings, and this cemented the Heliocentric thought into society, and "proved" the earth spun on itself, and spun around the Sun (hehehehe).  This event became known as “Foucault Pendulums."   Obviously, there are many authors and scholars now that question a whole host of parameters in this event and experiment, but mainstream science still points to this event as the key to the Heliocentric model.......over a century ago.....heheh.

As the 20th century came about - schools and mainstream science started to push Heliocentricity into young children as fact;  that the earth spins upon itself at a whopping 1000mph (at the equator, which is nearly 20 miles a second), spins around the sun at a whopping 67,000mph,  and that the Sun is heading towards Lyra at another 28,000 mph or so.......in a galaxy of billions of stars, in a universe of billions of galaxies.....with not even a ripple on the surface of ones tea.

in 2014, 99.9999% of humans believe this ......that's good - blog over - bye.....

Errr,  No they don't actually....some sporadic pockets of lunatics are starting to raise their heads with puzzled looks.


Why?

Because there is a lot of modern intelligence, maths, research, and video technology that goes against it.   Also, the Heliocentric model helps to disconnect people, and it supports the theory of 'random evolution,' and takes away notions of intelligent creation.  If one was at the centre of the galaxy (Geocentric model) on a stationary earth, that kind of puts everything on it's head and makes one a little more special.   Note: I say centre of the Galaxy due to the celestial ball of stars revolving around the north pole - which would have to be the case if we were in a Geocentric model.



We’re each entitled to our own opinion, but not to our own facts, so lets plug on.....

The official "opinion" on why the earth spins in today's world is this:    "Earth spins because of the way it was formed. Our solar system formed about 4.6 billion years ago when a huge cloud of gas and dust started to collapse under its own gravity. As the cloud collapsed, it started to spin. Some of the material within this cloud gathered into swirling eddies and eventually formed into planets. As the planets formed they kept this spinning motion.  This is similar to what you see when skaters pull in their arms and spin faster.  As material gathered in more closely to form a planet, like Earth, the material spun faster. The Earth keeps on spinning because there are no forces acting to stop it.

Note:  Space dust?  Meteorites?  Space junk?   A satellite taking off or landing?  Tsunami's or Earthquakes pushing tectonic plates west? - All no, not even one mph has changed in millions of years we are told.


Heliocentrists claim with a straight face that their Earth spins at a constant velocity dragging the atmosphere in such a manner as to perfectly cancel all centrifugal, gravitational, and inertial forces so we do not feel the tiniest bit of motion, perturbation, wind or air resistance!

"Astronomers say the magical magnetism of gravity is what keeps all the oceans of the world stuck to the ball-Earth.  They say that because the Earth is so massive, by virtue of this mass it creates a magic force able to hold people, oceans and atmosphere tightly clung to the underside of the spinning ball.  Unfortunately, however, they cannot provide any practical example of this on a scale smaller than the planetary.  For example, a spinning wet tennis ball has the exact opposite effect of the supposed ball-Earth! Any water poured over it simply falls off the sides,  and giving it a spin results in water flying off 360 degrees like a dog shaking after a bath.  Astronomers concede the wet tennis ball example displays the opposite effect of their supposed ball-Earth, but claim that at some unknown 
mass, the magic adhesive properties of gravity suddenly kick in allowing the spinning wet tennis ball-Earth to keep every drop of “gravitized” water stuck to the surface.  Again, their theory flies in the face of all practical evidence, but they have been running with it for 500 years, so why stop now?"  Eric Dubay, Author.

At my school they explained gravity by filling a bucket of water and getting a pupil to spin it around themself without any water spilling.......err, this is the opposite motion to what is happening on earth.....heheh.

Here's some information to get us up and going.......You may have to watch these twice and think about it.



Everyone thinks that the atmosphere rotates too (hehe), but nobody really knows at what altitude this stops being the case.  Some say 100km up, known as the kármán line, where by most definitions the atmosphere ends and outer space begins.   So then, could you please explain to me how the air over all its densities up to 100km keeps to the exact speed of the rotating Earth?  E.g. Low air slower and high air faster (as further to travel).

Could you also explain to me how clouds go in different directions - and how trade winds at different heights also go in different directions.  You will be amazed to know that this has NEVER been explained.     Repetition when 7 or 8 years old goes deep into the subbie conscious.

"Why can we feel the slightest westward breeze but not the Earth’s incredible supposed 1,000 mph Eastward spin!?  And how is it that the magic velcro of gravity is strong enough to drag miles of Earth’s atmosphere along, but weak enough to allow little bugs, birds, clouds and planes to travel freely unabated in any direction?"  Eric Dubay, Author.

“If the earth is at a given point in space on say January 1st, and according to present-day science, at a distance of 190,000,000 miles from that point six months afterwards, it follows that the relative  position and directions of the stars will have greatly changed, however small the angle of parallax may be. That this great change is nowhere apparent and has never been observed incontestably proves that the earth is at rest - that it does not move in an orbit round the sun.”  -Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny”




If you look below, modern mainstream science say that if you stand on the north pole you will spin around on the spot - why has nobody then ever filmed this somehow from an above satellite and sped it up?  This would prove the Heliocentric model.   Why are there no-fly zones and UN protection of the Arctic and Antarctic?  (More on this in part 2).

"Ah, what about Seasons and the procession of the equinox then?"   In the strange Heliocentric model, heat from the sun travels over 90 million miles to get here, but how come just a couple more thousand miles (due to the earth's tilt) can give tropical summers and arctic winters?  

To explain seasons in the Geocentric model, the Sun would slowly go up and down on a spiral over  365 days - as it goes around the earth daily.  The sun in this model is a lot closer to us (even closer to us than Mars).  The celestial ball of stars around the solar system wobbles instead of the earth, keeping the precession of the equinox', but shifting the cause.

Not super relevant, but I like it.  The ancient mystical system of the Tree of life from Qabalah also to this day presents the Geocentric model.


If this blog has raised some questions, or seems too simplistic, for a deeper more complex walkthrough, look here, and also witness the attempts at debunk in the comments sections.
Heliocentric Theory is Wrong Part 1.
Heliocentric Theory is Wrong Part 2.

Personally, this whole blog is just a starter and primer for part 2.


Mx



Thursday, 13 November 2014

The Increase in Food Rigidity Preaching.




Food awareness and education is slowly transmuting into cults of rigidity preaching and something needs to be said.

I think I'm half suitable to write this as I've done scores of different fasts, in which I've spent 10 days in a row on water,  55 days in a row on just two liquid drinks a day, done some brutal and softer cleanses, and was vegan for some years.

Most of the above was for a reason -  meditation/inner work, or preparing for plant medicines, or seeking insight/downloads for a creative project, or within an alchemical / hermetic silent retreat, but what I see now are many people who simply "eat healthily" and think they are enlightened or spiritually evolved.  It's even becoming a little culty and preachy, and many are starting to hold disdain for those who may eat meat, fish, bread, or heaven forbid, the killer that is ....white rice.



A friend wisely said, "I view it as 'vicarious enlightenment'.  They somehow believe that if they eat the right foods, wear the right woven fabrics, do everything in that mawkish ethically 'correct' way then they will absorb enlightenment....without any sincere effort. They'd be better off doing nothing than doing that."

To create some perspective, look at these two types of people that exist in the world.

1)  I was once with a hermetic master/guide for 100 days, he chain smoked and gave little any attention to what he ate (unless in a silent process), but he was extremely tapped in and evolved.  He could astral travel on a whim, meditate in the void for hours, and channel in a way I've never witnessed before, or will again.

2) There are many sporty and athletic types sponsored by big corporations, and/or part of a dodgy businesses like boxing or the Olympics, and they eat super healthy.  Are these people enlightened and evolved, or are they obsessive, rigid, egoistic, obsessive, and competitive?

The final straw was this week someone on social media stating 'how bad bread is.'    Now, it's hardly crack-cocaine is it, and I've eaten wholemeal bread from the local bakery, and didn't die or become unfit, or even have trouble in the loo.   Also, much of the planet lives on less than $1 a day, so it's slightly obnoxious and tossy to look down upon anyone eating bread when one is importing packet 'organic' food from other countries at high prices.   Is it not a little obnoxious, egoistic, self righteous, and tossy to post expensive organic meals online regularly, that half the world cannot afford or ever hope to eat.

"Hi, look what we spent five hours making today, vegan cake."


"Hi, this is our only meal today, and it's the same as yesterday.   But we are all one and all is love as you above also keep posting."



Organic food in a packet that has been flown overseas - for sure a paradox....a similar paradox to High Class Hooker.

*

I don't really get why the "you should eat A B C" gangs are really pushing it so much?
Many people travel in cars, and there is no crusade to get them cycling or walking;  "You are toxic, buying oil, and buying cars from mega corps, sitting in metal!  You should walk - so much better for you!"
Also some people fly from England to France, but there is no gang of people shouting at them to use a pedalo across the channel?   "The air quality is so much better on the pedalo, and its better for your legs."  

One can look at the raw food communities - yes, eating raw is pretty good for you - but to have gatherings only for raw food eaters?    Is there a marmite only eaters festival?  Or a Steak on Saturdays festival?     If I was into raw food but liked roast potatoes too - how would it go down at the festival?   "Hi leader guru dude,"  "On you're knees when you approach me!"   "Err, ok, sorry..... I'm being narcissistic and gluttonous too by spending all day making a meal and talking about it as I make it,  but I'm also going to rustle up some roast spuds on the side, is that ok?"  "Get out of here you filth and don't ever come back!"

The raw food crews even have their own online communities  - this one has each member stating their favourite raw food dish, with a brief summary of themselves which they use to network/friend/date/marry/mate.



www.rawfoodcult.com wrote this shocking statement (if I see anyone is laughing or smirking you will have a profile created on the above site saying you are single).

"Myth: The raw food community loves me and cares for me.
Fact: The raw food community is largely comprised of people who want to feel normal but have self esteem issues or eating disorders. They want validation that they are in fact not “weird” and that they are making the right choice. The best way to do that is to group together with other people who also eat the same diet. The moment you stop eating raw, the vast majority of raw foodists will want nothing to do with you. Although it is humorous, the truth is that many raw foodists believe that “non raw” human’s simply smell bad and are unenlightened. "

**

Also, if one is cleansing "all the time" - no energy can build up.

So, if one of these food preachers spent a day in the Japanese mountains with a zen master, and at the end of the day was invited into the home, and the wife bought out some cooked fish, what would the person say?  "Err, i don't eat fish?"

So, if one of these food preachers spent time in a Nepalese mountain village, and a cow was sacrificed for a Hindu festival of gratitude, the person would say, "I don't eat meat."

Do you know how rude and disrespectful the above two examples would be?   One has to be flexible and not so rigid, to be respectful and not narcissistic.  To sacrifice oneself for the whole.   Not to create limiting walls around oneself for the sake of a label.


A few years back, I had been vegan and hadn't touched alcohol for a few years......and it was great, but I realised I was becoming a little rigid and was isolating myself sometimes.......so I went an ate a whole chicken, and washed it down with a bottle of white wine...no song or dance, I just went and did it......and do you know what?     I felt ok in the morning, I was still the same person, meditation didn't suffer, and I didn't die.....and I learnt about flexibility and rigidity, and self imposed limits.

Stuart Wilde once said something like, "If you've been on a strict vegan diet for years, go for a big mac and wash it down with a pint of vodka - to prove to yourself that you are flexible, and then go back to being a vegan the next day."

*

Some of the preachy food "enlightened" people still live with their parents.
Some of the preachy food "enlightened" people still work for a boss for 30 hours a week.
Some of the preachy food "enlightened" people ingest toxic people, toxic information, and toxic TV.
Some of the preachy food "enlightened" people are not sure how they will survive financially through the next months.

If I was in one of the above groups, food would be down the list of my priorities, and that's a bold and arguable statement.....but this line backs it up:

Living in freedom and eating a bit of this and that (sometimes) is a much higher vibration than not living in freedom and eating with extreme fuss.

Is it not a little gay also?   A grown man being super finicky with food (unless in a process or healing?)  "Oh Sharon, I know it's our first date, but I just don't eat wheat, or fish, or meat, or glutton, or sugar, or dairy, no matter what, ever.......in fact, we cannot be together if our food tastes are not the same, even though the chemical attraction is off the charts and our auras just want to merge."    

If these people like "food" so much (gluttony? service to self?) - then why not go and quietly grow some, and provide some for other people?  Or write a book about food?

It's actually the rigiditiy and anal-ness that will do the damage to ones health and relationships - not something that is a tiny bit bad for you.  If one is healthy one can easily get rid of some occasional toxins anyway.   But if one is too focused on cleansing for no actual reason, then surely that is fear based?    Surely something slightly toxic will then come and knock them sideways.
One has the options to live a little more middle way (well, a third across), and do a two or three day cleanse just before new moon - there are many options, and it's different for everyone.....why? Because we are all different.

"But I thought we were all one, what do you mean different?"

Keep up at the back.

*

So, if one of the food cult crew was with a lovely partner in a log cabin, after a perfect day with the log fire on, and out came Sharon with some fine red wine and local cheese next to the log fire - one would say no?


So, if one of the food cult crews was with a lovely partner on an exotic beach, and out came some fine white wine and fish - one would say no?



If you say no,  are you missing out on an exquisite earth experience through rigidity?   You will not die - it could be a one off, what is there to be afraid of?  It's not like taking three E's and a gram of ketamine, and washing it down with vodka.  Are people afraid of going back to their old ways completely?     Is it that many have become to identify themselves with what they eat?   Are many people now lost in self defining labels?   If so, that is far from healthy or enlightened.

"Some people are so afraid to die, that they never begin to live." Henry Van Dyke.

I had some 'friends' who wouldn't eat some family produced local Mangoes I offered them - as I couldn't prove whether their thick skins had been sprayed or not whilst they were growing - then they continued to talk about food for some hours (not sure how long, as I luckily fell asleep before hanging myself).   It is positive to eat healthy - but when it becomes a grown man's main talking point and life "thing" - it becomes kinda rigid. Similar say, to the energy signature as a gym person.

Another friend came out with this great wisdom;

"Usually the food pickiness/obsession is going with an obsession about bowel movements -- lower chakra issues, and such people are generally the worst control freaks."  ummshams

Conclusions:

Most issues within a person are caused by negitive emotions, thoughts, and evironments, not by food (but regular toxic food can create a decent foundation for the above three).

"When you die," says the Koran, "God will call upon you to account for all the permitted pleasures you did not enjoy while on earth."

The Talmud offers a similar idea: "A person will be called upon to account, on Judgement Day, for all the permitted pleasures he might have enjoyed but did not."

Are there any such pleasures in your life?

A wise man once said to me, "don't spend longer preparing your food than eating it."

I wrote a conceptual story once based in the future, about the holistic world having a revolution, taking control, and then getting too rigid....you can read it if you like..."Holistic Revolution Flip."

Mx

Wednesday, 5 November 2014

A Symbol.


Here's a concept from a short story I'm playing with, but decided to share it in a blog as it fits with what the 5th November represents historically.

People say one can't do anything about the system's corruption, control, and lies, and to walk away and not feed it......something I agree with - but there is actually something one could do to speed up change / the end of this cycle.

Note: One may think this article is anti-system, but in reality it is a corrupt and greedy system that is anti-humanity and anti-earth.

Symbols hold energy, and are the currency in the astral/inner worlds.   One look at a symbol, sigil, or logo, and feelings are roused.  Symbols also exist deep within the collective consciousness of humanity.

The short story in development was seeking a symbol that could.......

  • Unite people from many walks of life that have a shared bond and goal  (truth seekers, counter culture, healers, those seeking change, those supressed, protesters,  those pushed into poverty, new agers,  those who's local infrastructure and resources have been gobbled up....etc etc.
  • "Re-energise" toxic things from the system acting as a sigil.
  • Increase awareness, a feeling, a natural trajctory.
  • Appear simple but deep in meaning.
  • Be placed/drawn on adverts, notes, and anything toxic, such as any energy that comes from the areas of central banking, hedge funds, eliteism, NWO, corruption, earth damage, or corporate mind control etc.


I managed to pluck such a symbol out of the ether for the story, and plonked it into being with 5 simple brush strokes  - simple but deep with meaning.


It looks like an eye awakening.
It can be spun anticlockwise.  Anti-Clock (status-quo tick-tock) Wise.  The alternate way to the norm.
Whatever way the wind blows, it still spins Anti-clockwise (unmoveable in its meaning).
It contains two letter 'T's  (Truth).
It contains two letter 'F's  (Freedom).
It contains two letter 'L's (Love).
When spinning it symbolises a heart chakra.
The dot in the middle is the self; I have a voice, I have the right to disobey.
Shaped like a diamond: hard to break, but also beautiful.
It looks like a man spinning from above - creating space for the self from oppression, lies, and propaganda.
Green is the earth, and also the Sephiroth of the Qabalistic Tree of Life meaning "Victory in splendour," a nature based Sephiroth representing ITmore feeling and emotion than others.


In the story the symbol starts to appear everywhere (graffiti, around cities, on CEO's cars, billboards, banners, stickers, public transport etc) as more and more people get on board with the simple philosophy of seeking positive change and irradicating toxicity.   Change ends up being brought about without talking, voilence, or marching, just simple use of a simple symbol.

Crazy huh?

Mx

Thursday, 23 October 2014

The Emperor of all lies (Part 2): The Oh-bum-ah Family?



In part 1 we looked at the mega lie from Zionism.  Zionists lie a lot, so it's only natural and healthy to go back and look at all their big claims.

Here in part 2 we will do similar with the Corporate / Banking puppet, and actor, Obama.   He lies a lot, so it's only natural and healthy to hunt for some other lies.

*

The first time I came across all this I disregarded it as nonsense, but then more information popped up, and more videos kept getting taken off Youtube.

Then after my initial childish sniggering,  I managed to summarise the information.   Make of it what you will, but rationally dissect the information first instead of coming to any knee jerk belief system.

Quick Note1: I have nothing against anyone's sexual or gender persuasion, I'm just seeking truth.   Most of us have been reincarnated as men and women before so we are all trans-gender anyway.

Quick Note2:  I have no care for left or right theatre, or tea party movements,  I have no political agenda with this information.


So, lets walk slowly through this one, and if I catch anyone sniggering, you will be sent to facebook to look at cats, puppies, dinners, and preening selfies.

Ok, there have been some trash magazines and tabloid toilet paper bringing up various Obama gay scandals.





Ok, that doesn't mean much, but in 2008 Larry Sinclair held a meeting at the National Press Club to address his alleged gay relationship with Barack Obama, the then 2008 Democratic presidential candidate, to answer questions from the Press.  Larry Sinclair stated to the press that he and Barack Obama had gay sex while Obama smoked crack, not once but twice.  Once in a limo and the next day in a hotel room.  Sinclair stated that the murdered Donald Young, Obama's churches gay choir master told him, by phone, he also had sex with Barack Obama........before Young was murdered.


Reports that Barack Obama had a Homosexual fling with his Pastor:

                                       

The murdered Church director to conceal Obama's sexuality?



Ok, what else have we got?

Obama cheered when the gay marriage was made legal, and make of what you will of these photos.  






There is a mountain of evidence about, some of the best being here, here, here, and here.

Obama, is....well, he's a bit gay.


***

For those that haven't clicked the red 'x' and gone back to facebook, take a deep breath, for this next grouping of information I am only 60/40, whereas on the above I am a 75/25.

There is much talk about Michelle Obama having been born a man, and that he/she has undergone hormone therapy to help him become a woman.   Many believe he was born in Chicago as Michael LaVaughn Robinson, the son of  a well known cocaine dealer and union thug for Crime Lord/Mayor Richard J. Daleyn, and underwent a partial sex change in his youth.

What information is there to support this?
              
       


There are now literally over 100 videos on youtube pointing to Michelle being a transgender human, so here are a couple.
   
                               
     
                               

(note, I don't really buy into the shoulders or fingers' reasons).

But here are some pictures, make of it them what you will.










Ok, then, "But they have two children," I here you say.  But there are no images anywhere of Michelle pregnant, and save for the teeth job, is there really much resemblance (taking into account the above photos)?   The two sisters also look very different, adoption?   (sidenote, for sure that is a wig Michelle is wearing).



This dude did a search, and found no birth records on the Ancestry.com or GenealogyBank.com.

So it's up to you what you believe, but for me it's slightly more probable than not, that.....



Conclusion:

I think this all may be a bet between Rothchild and Rockafella - "Oy Rothers, I bet you $10 billion I can take down the trade towers and blame it all on a Muslim in a cave, enabling us to goto war and take over the opium and oil."    "No chance Rockafella, if you do that, I'll employ a gay drug taking black guy with a Muslim name to be President, and even throw in a transgender wife."   "You're on!"

;-)

Mx

ps.  Sigh, those sane conspiracy theorists.
pps. For some reason google wouldn't let me publish this blog and I had to repaste and cut parts from notepad and frig about a lot.....the bots are onto me it seems.....heheh

Saturday, 11 October 2014

Ebola predictive programming (or synchromysticism).



First off, there are so many fear articles about Ebola that I gift you the above picture to use in comment sections.

*

Anyway, my blog on Ebola being manmade has had thousands of views, but here is something else very interesting.

A Simpson's episode aired on "911" in 1997 had a book cover of a monkey called Curious George with Ebola.


Ok - nothing much to see here one might think - but then one can look at the Simpson's shot of a magazine cover showing 911 and a $ sign (long before it happened).


Ok, many can still write this all off as coincidence (which I don't personally believe in).

So then, when one looks up "Curious George," one finds this episode called Curious George Comes to America and Goes to the Hospital.



In which, a monkey is taken from Africa to an America Hospital by a man in a Yellow Hat called Ted.


The letters TED also stand for Thomas Eric Duncan, the man who actually brought Ebola from Africa to America (according to the mainstream), and the man in yellow could (at a stretch) also link to this:


**

Also, why is the CDC telling us "Winter is Coming?" from Game of Thrones?



We are also being bombarded with far too much toxic green (ebola) in corporate advertising at the moment.



Others also present a lot of predictive programming.


*
On March 10, 2014, the World health Organization (known as WHO, and I tore them apart in my first book 6 years ago) recognized the Ebola outbreak in West Africa, so what is going on here?  And here?   (Google won't let me put these videos in this blog).

There are even other recent films with this date too (This reminds me of  the Matrix's film passport with the 911 date).




This is all either predictive programming (the powers that be are bombarding our subconscious so we are ready and prepared for what is coming).    Or it is all synchromysticism (a layer in our reality / the astral knows the energy of a building vortex and places things into the physical as the vortex of an event comes nearer / spins up).


"Synchromysticism - Reality is that which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away."                Phil K Dick.


The bottom line is there are people in the world that want you watching and listening to this, and not watching and listening to things like this....

...and believing orchestrated theatre like this.......



Mx

P.s Funny how western countries are sending lots of troops and 'experts' to Africa and then keep bringing them back once they are infected with the Ebola virus.

Wednesday, 8 October 2014

The Emperor of all lies (Part 1): The Holocaust 6 Million.




The Holocaust is THE paradigm for Jewish suffering, and is treated as being beyond examination and scrutiny.  Questioning the official Holocaust narrative is at best, socially unacceptable, leading often to social exclusion and discrimination, and is even illegal in 13 European countries.  

*

I implore the reader to let go of group think, school education, nationalism, media buzzwords, and political labelling.  If you can't do this, please stop reading.
I have no hatred towards any racial or religious groups, and don't care for left or right theatrical politics, so these are not the motivation for this blog.

But If zionist media can lie about  911, 77, Diana, Gaza, Central banks, toxins, then all is open to question.

Most people's knowledge and belief system regarding The Holocaust comes from a western school or from Hollywood based movies.   So few have actually studied the core evidence.

                                     

*

So what actually does the word Holocaust actually mean?

The Oxford Dictionary Online tells us the following: .  

* hol·o·caust  (hl-kôst, hl-)
"Destruction or slaughter on a mass scale, especially caused by fire or nuclear war: a nuclear holocaust
1.1 (the Holocaust) The mass murder of Jews under the German Nazi regime during the period 1941-5. More than 6 million European Jews, as well as members of other persecuted groups, were murdered at concentration camps such as Auschwitz."

So there it is in the Oxford dictionary, 6m Jews murdered at camps, mainly Auhswitz, just as our schools and TV told us.


Strangely, the number of 6 million Jews was used in the mainstream press many times long before WW2 even started, is this a symbolic number?



6,000,000 in numerology reduces to 6, which is the letter VAU, which translates to Nail or Hook.  The esotric meaning of VAU is nailing thro (hooking) all levels of correspondence, and also means physical unification and unity.

It was widely reported during World War One ( 1914 to 1918 ) that the Germans and their allies were using gas chambers to kill thousands of prisoners. However, in 1919, after the end of the War British Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin admitted in Parliament that it had been propaganda and no such gas chambers had existed.  He also apologised publicly to the German People for this racist slur on them.

During World War One the British Government had agreed with leading Jews that they would support a Jewish homeland in Palestine in exchange for the powerful Jewish lobby in America getting the USA to join the Allies. This led to the Balfour Declaration being made by the British Government promising the Jews a homeland in Palestine. After World War One the British Government were unable, or unwilling, to make good on this promise. From 1919 onwards the Jews claimed 6 million Jews in Europe were under threat from extermination unless they got a homeland in Palestine. This was 14 years before the Nazis came to power and 24 years before the alleged Holocaust started.


There was a total population of roughly 6 Million Jews in the whole of Europe when the WWII broke out. There were about a half million in Germany.

*

The 6 million Jews Holocaust story centres around a concentration camp called Auschwitz, so lets focus here.

The Auschwitz camp complex was set up in 1940 in what is now south-central Poland, and large numbers of Jews were deported there between 1942 and mid-1944.

Scholars do not dispute the fact that large numbers of Jews were deported to the camp, or that many died there, particularly of typhus and other diseases. But the compelling evidence they present shows that Auschwitz was not an extermination center and that the story of mass killings in "gas chambers" is a myth.

Today no reputable historian, not even those who generally accept the extermination story, believes the 6m figure.  Israeli Holocaust historian Yehuda Bauer said in 1989 that it is time to finally acknowledge the familiar six million (at Aushwitz) figure is a deliberate myth.  In July 1990 the Auschwitz State Museum in Poland, along with Israel's Yad Vashem Holocaust Center, suddenly announced that altogether perhaps one million people (both Jews and non-Jews) died there. Neither institution would say how many of these people were killed, nor were any estimates given of the numbers of those supposedly gassed. [1] One prominent Holocaust historian, Gerald Reitlinger, has estimated that perhaps 700,000 or so Jews perished at Auschwitz. More recently, Holocaust historian Jean-Claude Pressac has estimated that about 800,000 persons, of whom 630,000 were Jewish, perished at Auschwitz.



And at the Nuremberg Tribunal, chief U.S. prosecutor Robert Jackson charged that the Germans used a "newly invented" device to instantaneously "vaporize" 20,000 Jews near Auschwitz "in such a way that there was no trace left of them." [2] No reputable historian now accepts either of these fanciful tales.

A key Holocaust document is the "confession" of former Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss of April 5, 1946, which was submitted by the U.S. prosecution at the main Nuremberg trial. [3]   Although it is still widely cited as solid proof for the Auschwitz extermination story, it is actually a false statement that was obtained by torture.



Many years after the war, British military intelligence sergeant Bernard Clarke described how he and five other British soldiers tortured the former commandant to obtain his "confession." Höss himself privately explained his ordeal in these words: "Certainly, I signed a statement that I killed two and half million Jews. I could just as well have said that it was five million Jews. There are certain methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether it is true or not." [4]

The Höss "affidavit" further alleges that Jews were already being exterminated by gas in the summer of 1941 at three other camps: Belzec, Treblinka and Wolzek. The "Wolzek" camp mentioned by Höss is a total invention. No such camp existed, and the name is no longer mentioned in Holocaust literature.

Many thousands of secret German documents dealing with Auschwitz were confiscated after the war by the Allies. Not a single one refers to a policy or program of extermination. In fact, the extermination story cannot be reconciled with the documentary evidence.

In a secret report dated April 5, 1944, on "Security measures in Auschwitz" by Oswald Pohl, head of the SS concentration camp system, to SS chief Heinrich Himmler, Pohl reported that there was a total of 67,000 inmates in the entire Auschwitz camp complex, of whom 18,000 were hospitalized or disabled. In the Auschwitz II camp (Birkenau), supposedly the main extermination center, there were 36,000 inmates, mostly female, of whom "approximately 15,000 are unable to work." [5]

Allied planes dropped large numbers of leaflets, written in Polish and German, on Auschwitz and the surrounding areas which claimed that people were being gassed in the camp. The Auschwitz gassing story, which was an important part of the Allied wartime propaganda effort, was also broadcast to Europe by Allied radio stations. [6]



An Austrian woman, Maria Vanherwaarden, testified about her camp experiences in a Toronto District Court in March 1988. She was interned in Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1942 for having sexual relations with a Polish forced laborer. On the train trip to the camp, a Gypsy woman told her and the others that they would all be gassed at Auschwitz.
 Upon arrival, Maria and the other women were ordered to undress and go into a large concrete room without windows to take a shower. The terrified women were sure that they were about to die. But then, instead of gas, water came out of the shower heads.
 Auschwitz was no vacation center, Maria confirmed. She witnessed the death of many fellow inmates by disease, particularly typhus, and quite a few committed suicide. But she saw no evidence at all of mass killings, gassings, or of any extermination program. [7]

A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily. She likewise testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of "gas chambers" during the time she was interned there. She heard the gassing stories only later. [8]

Auschwitz internees who had served their sentences were released and returned to their home countries. If Auschwitz had actually been a top secret extermination center, the Germans would certainly not have released inmates who "knew" what was happening in the camp. [9]

The head of the SS camp administration office sent a directive dated Dec. 28, 1942, to Auschwitz and the other concentration camps.
he directive stressed that "the Reichsfhrer SS [Heinrich Himmler] has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be reduced." [10]


Cremation specialists have confirmed that thousands of corpses could not possibly have been cremated every day throughout the spring and summer of 1944 at Auschwitz, as commonly alleged.   For example, Mr. Ivan Lagace, manager of a large crematory in Calgary, Canada, testified in court in April 1988 that the Auschwitz cremation story is technically impossible. The allegation that 10,000 or even 20,000 corpses were burned every day at Auschwitz in the summer of 1944 in crematories and open pits is simply "preposterous" and "beyond the realm of reality," he declared under oath. [11]

America's leading gas chamber expert, Boston engineer Fred A. Leuchter, carefully examined the supposed "gas chambers" in Poland and concluded that the Auschwitz gassing story is absurd and technically impossible.[12]

In February 1988 he carried out a detailed onsite examination of the "gas chambers" at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek in Poland, which are either still standing or only partially in ruins. In sworn testimony to a Toronto court and in a technical report, Leuchter described every aspect of his investigation.
He concluded by emphatically declaring that the alleged gassing facilities could not possibly have been used to kill people. Among other things, he pointed out that the so-called "gas chambers" were not properly sealed or vented to kill human beings without also killing German camp personnel. [12]

Dr. William B. Lindsey, a research chemist employed for 33 years by the Dupont Corporation, likewise testified in a 1985 court case that the Auschwitz gassing story is technically impossible. Based on a careful on-site examination of the "gas chambers" at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek, and on his years of experience, he declared: "I have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully killed with Zyklon B [hydrocyanic acid gas] in this manner. I consider it absolutely impossible." [13]

The Facts: It takes about 70 minutes (according to one furnace manufacturer's spec sheet, see [1] ) to cremate a body even today. This is a burner of 400KW. If each crematory furnace were to cremate 20.6 bodies in every 24 hour period running 7 days a week, then to handle 20,000 bodies a day would require more than 971 furnaces running non-stop, AND sufficient fuel to keep them all operating. And all this, in a Germany that was always short on fuel?

It seems most died from the wartime typhus epidemic and severe malnutrition-induced illness, work and starvation.

It had originally been claimed that "over 4.5 million" of the "six million Jews" had been "gassed" there. This figure went through many, many permutations and revisions by the JEWS THEMSELVES until about 1985, when Dr. Francisek Piper - the very one whom the American Jew, David Cole, interviewed in his now famous video - the one in which Piper admits that the "gas chamber" that was always shown to the tourists there - was actually built in 1947! - two years AFTER the war was over.
It was Dr. Piper, Auschwitz Chief Archivist and historian for 27 years, who first 'officially' lowered the number to "1.5 million" and then, by 1988 - again lowered to "1.1 million."


Fritjof Meyer, a respected foreign policy analyst, author of several books, and managing editor of Germany's foremost weekly news magazine, presented a still lower figure in 2002. Writing in the scholarly German journal Osteuropa, he estimated that altogether 500,000 or 510,000 persons — Jews and non-Jews — perished in Auschwitz. (F. Meyer, "Die Zahl der Opfer von Auschwitz," Osteuropa,  May 2002, pp. 631-641. Cited in: M. Weber, "New 'Official' Changes in the Auschwitz Story," The Journal of Historical Review, May-August 2002, pp. 24-28)


When the Red Cross interviewed thousands of freed camp inmates at the end of the war, asking whether they had witnessed alleged ‘gassings,’ the response was universally negative. According to IRC document #9925, June, 1946: "The detainees themselves have not spoken of them."

One of the pieces of evidence Professor Ernst Zundel produced at his trials in Canada was the “Leuchter Report” compiled by Fred Leuchter on his commission. Fred Leuchter is the World’s foremost expert on gas chambers, and holds the patents for nearly all the gas chambers used for executions in the World. He has also personally built, or supervised the building, of all gas chambers in the USA and most in the rest of the World. After inspecting the alleged gas chambers at Auschwitz, Leuchter concluded they were unsuitable for use as gas chambers due to their lack of airtight doors, lack of a gas extraction system and general shoddy build. He also chemically analysed the walls for ferrocyanide ( produced when Zyklon-B reacts with brick walls ) and concluded there was none – the Auschwitz authorities took the same tests with the same results and now admit there was no gas chamber in Auschwitz.

During World War Two Germany invaded France and occupied Northern France from 1940 to 1944. A secret army of French Patriots known collectively as “The French Resistance” fought the German occupiers in various ways. A large number of French Resistance members were imprisoned, tortured and executed including their leader, and French National hero, Jean Moulin. After World War Two French resistance members were released from various German concentration camps, including Auschwitz and other alleged death camps. On their return to France they all gave horrific accounts of their treatment by the Germans, and were full of hatred for them because of the events of World War Two. However they all denied any knowledge of gas chambers and a mass murder programme in the concentration camps.


The Nuremberg Trials were held in the German City of Nuremberg from 1945 to 1949. These Trials were held by the victorious Allies ( France, Britain , USA and Soviet Russia ) with the Germans as defendants. They were the worst sort of show trials with the main Judge being Nikitchenko, who had presided over Stalins’ show trials of 1936 to 1938 in the Soviet Union. The Court came up with ridiculous findings like jews being turned in to lampshades and even soap, these claims are now discredited and even the jews admit they were untrue.

  

The Chief Justice of the United States Harlan Fiske Stone called the Nuremberg trials a fraud. He said “Chief US prosecutor Jackson is away conducting his high-grade lynching party in Nuremberg,” he wrote. “I don’t mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretence that he is running a Court and proceeding according to common law. This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas.”


The Nazis were technology freaks, to say the least, and filmed and photographed virtually everything they did during World War Two. Hitler even had executions of his political enemies filmed so he could watch them with his cronies. However there has never been a single photograph or film found of any of the alleged gas chambers in operation. The Nazis did film, and photograph, themselves committing many atrocities across occupied Europe so it seems unlikely they wouldn’t film the alleged gas chambers. All the films we are shown of gas chambers are Hollywood recreations made after the war.

In his monumental six volume 'The Second World War' Sir Winston Churchill, British wartime Prime Minister, never makes any reference to gas chambers or a planned mass extermination of European Jews. This is despite the fact he goes in to great detail about virtually every facet of World War Two including many atrocities committed by the Nazis.


“Shoa” is the term used by Jews and zionists to describe the alleged Holocaust. After the Second World War Germany was forced to pay trillions of Dollars in compensation to set up Israel, and is still paying to this day. There are now second and third generation, the children and grandchildren of alleged Holocaust victims, who receive compensation from the German Government and various German Corporations. The American Government also use this as an excuse to give billions of American taxpayers’ money to Israel, although the real reason behind these payments is the strength of the Israeli lobby in America.
As early as 1941, two years before the alleged Holocaust was even meant to have started, the World Jewish Congress had been demanding that the Germans pay for the resettlement of Jews in Israel as reparations.



**

Conclusions:

If the holocaust is a lie......
Which country's government has benefited from it most?  
Who actually won WW2 (came out of it best)?  
Who runs American Congress?
Where does the director of Shindler's List come from?
Who has more millionaires in their population as a percentage compared to other nations?
Who gains over $3bn American tax money to invest into high-tech military weapons?
Who since the late 40's has slowly began to control western banks, media, hollywood, and many large corporations?

If some people were capable of such a monstrous and evil lie, they would be probably be capable of something like extermination and other lies - who is performing a form of genocide in the world today (Gaza) and trying to gain support by lying in the media?



*
Beware of those judging someone a "denier" who simply questions official history.  This shows how strongly people are conditioned that they can't even apply the most basic critical thinking.

If you want to look into millions of civilians being exterminated around WW2, look the other way towards the German civilians between 1945-1950....For more information on this topic see books by the following authors: James Bacque (Other Losses) (Crimes and Mercies), Alfred M. de Zayas (Die Wehrmacht-Untersuch ungstelle) and (The Nemisis of Potsdam), Guido Knopp (Die Gefangenen), Erich Kern and Karl Balzer (Allierte Verbrechen and Deutschen). A similarly important historical document is the book titled (Alliierte Kriegsverbrechen) which translates to "Allied War Crimes", and "Gruesome Harvest."


Sources:
1. Y. Bauer, "Fighting the Distortions," Jerusalem Post (Israel), Sept. 22, 1989; "Auschwitz Deaths Reduced to a Million," Daily Telegraph (London), July 17, 1990; "Poland reduces Auschwitz Death Toll Estimate to 1 Million," The Washington Times, July 17, 1990.
2. IMT blue series, Vol. 16, p. 529-530. (June 21, 1946).
3. Nuremberg document 3868-PS (USA-819). IMT blue series, Vol. 33, pp.275-279.
4. Rupert Butler, Legions of Death (England: 1983), pp. 235; R. Faurisson,The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1986-87, pp. 389-403.
5. Nuremberg document NO-021. NMT green series, Vol. 5. pp. 384-385.
6. Nuremberg document NI-11696. NMT green series, Vol. 8, p. 606.
7. Testimony in Toronto District Court, March 28, 1988. Toronto Star, March 29, 1988, p. A2.
8. Sylvia Rothchild, ed., Voices from the Holocaust (New York: 1981), pp.188-191.
9. Walter Laqueur, The Terrible Secret (Boston: 1981), p. 169.
10. Nuremberg document PS-2171, Annex 2. NC&A red series, Vol. 4, pp.833-834.
11. Canadian Jewish News (Toronto), April 14, 1988, p. 6.
12. The Leuchter Report: An Engineering Report on the Alleged Execution Gas Chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek (Toronto: 1988). Available for $17.00, postpaid, from the IHR.
13. The Globe and Mail (Toronto), Feb. 12, 1985.